0.00/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 960 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 05:58:06 EDT 2022 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.46 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.19/0.46 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA. 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 600s (5) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh3l with 120s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_6 with 120s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 120s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # sh3l with pid 23518 completed with status 0 0.19/0.48 # Result found by sh3l 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA. 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 600s (5) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh3l with 120s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000 0.19/0.48 # ...ProofStateSinE()=22/128 0.19/0.48 # Search class: HGHNF-FFMM32-SSSFFSBN 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # new_ho_10 with pid 23521 completed with status 0 0.19/0.48 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA. 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 600s (5) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh3l with 120s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000 0.19/0.48 # ...ProofStateSinE()=22/128 0.19/0.48 # Search class: HGHNF-FFMM32-SSSFFSBN 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.19/0.48 0.19/0.48 # Proof found! 0.19/0.48 # SZS status Theorem 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_22, type, agent_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_23, type, attribute_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_24, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiiIiioI: ($i > $i) > $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_25, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_26, type, domain_THFTYPE_IiiioI: $i > $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_27, type, equal_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_28, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_29, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiiIioI: ($i > $i) > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_30, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_31, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiooIioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_32, type, instance_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_33, type, lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_34, type, lAsymmetricRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_35, type, lBeginFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_36, type, lBen_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_37, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_38, type, lBinaryPredicate_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_39, type, lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_40, type, lEndFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_41, type, lInteger_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_42, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_43, type, lMeasureFn_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_44, type, lOrganism_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_45, type, lProcess_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_46, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_47, type, lTemporalRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_48, type, lTimeInterval_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_49, type, lTotalValuedRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_50, type, lUnaryFunction_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_51, type, lWhenFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_52, type, lWhenFn_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_53, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_54, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_55, type, located_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_56, type, meetsTemporally_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_57, type, n1_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_58, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_59, type, n2_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_60, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_61, type, part_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_62, type, patient_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_63, type, range_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_64, type, subProcess_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_65, type, subclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_66, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIioIIioIoI: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_67, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_68, type, temporalPart_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_69, type, esk1_3: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_70, type, esk2_3: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_71, type, esk3_3: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_72, type, esk4_3: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(con, conjecture, ?[X18:$i > $i > $o, X19:$i > $i > $o, X20:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (((((X19 @ X20 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&~(![X21:$i, X22:$i]:((X18 @ X21 @ X22))))&~(![X21:$i, X22:$i]:((X19 @ X21 @ X22))))&(X18 @ X20 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)). 0.19/0.48 thf(ax_010, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_010)). 0.19/0.48 thf(ax_031, axiom, ![X13:$i, X14:$o]:(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X13 @ (~((X14))))=>~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X13 @ ((X14)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_031)). 0.19/0.48 thf(ax_021, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_021)). 0.19/0.48 thf(ax_004, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_004)). 0.19/0.48 thf(ax_028, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_028)). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X18:$i > $i > $o, X19:$i > $i > $o, X20:$i]:(((~(((((X19 @ X20 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&~(![X21:$i, X22:$i]:((X18 @ X21 @ X22))))&~(![X21:$i, X22:$i]:((X19 @ X21 @ X22))))&(X18 @ X20 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(((((X19 @ X20 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&~(![X21:$i, X22:$i]:((X18 @ X21 @ X22))))&~(![X21:$i, X22:$i]:((X19 @ X21 @ X22))))&(X18 @ X20 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X45:$i > $i > $o, X46:$i > $i > $o, X47:$i, X52:$i, X53:$i, X54:$i, X55:$i]:(((((((~(X46 @ X47 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X45 @ X52 @ X53)|(X46 @ X54 @ X55)|~(X45 @ X47 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(X46 @ X47 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X46 @ X47 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))&((~(X46 @ X47 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X45 @ X52 @ X53)|(X46 @ X54 @ X55)|~(X45 @ X47 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|~(X45 @ (esk1_3 @ X45 @ X46 @ X47) @ (esk2_3 @ X45 @ X46 @ X47)))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(X45 @ (esk1_3 @ X45 @ X46 @ X47) @ (esk2_3 @ X45 @ X46 @ X47)))))&((~(X46 @ X47 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X45 @ X52 @ X53)|(X46 @ X54 @ X55)|~(X45 @ X47 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|~(X46 @ (esk3_3 @ X45 @ X46 @ X47) @ (esk4_3 @ X45 @ X46 @ X47)))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(X46 @ (esk3_3 @ X45 @ X46 @ X47) @ (esk4_3 @ X45 @ X46 @ X47)))))&((~(X46 @ X47 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X45 @ X52 @ X53)|(X46 @ X54 @ X55)|~(X45 @ X47 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(X45 @ X47 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X45 @ X47 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))))&((~(X46 @ X47 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X45 @ X52 @ X53)|(X46 @ X54 @ X55)|~(X45 @ X47 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_8, axiom, ((~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_010])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X18:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i]:(((X18 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_10, plain, ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_11, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))|~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X13:$i, X14:$o]:(((((X14)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X13 @ $true))&(~(X14)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X13 @ $false)))=>~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X13 @ ((X14))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_031])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i, X3:$i, X5:$i, X18:$i > $i > $o, X19:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i, X1:$i]:(((X19 @ X2 @ X3)|(X18 @ X4 @ X5)|~((X18 @ X1 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((X19 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_15, plain, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X56:$i, X57:$o]:(((((X57)|~(X57)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X56 @ ((X57))))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X56 @ $false)|~(X57)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X56 @ ((X57)))))&(((X57)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X56 @ $true)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X56 @ ((X57))))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X56 @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X56 @ $true)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X56 @ ((X57))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_17, plain, (((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_021])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i, X19:$i > $i > $o, X18:$i > $i > $o, X5:$i]:(((X18 @ X1 @ X2)|(X19 @ X3 @ X4)|~((X19 @ X5 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|~((X18 @ X5 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_19, axiom, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_004])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X1:$i]:((~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (($true))))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (~($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_21, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_22, plain, (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_028])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i, X18:$i > $i > $o]:(((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)|(X18 @ X3 @ X4)|~((X18 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_12])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_24, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_25, plain, (~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true))))|~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_26, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)|(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X3 @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_28, plain, (~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_11])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_30, plain, ~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_12])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_29]), c_0_15])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_32, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_31])]), ['proof']). 0.19/0.48 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 128 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 106 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 54 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 51 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 119 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 2 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 27 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 90 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 21 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 28 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 97 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 89 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 96 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 0 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 12 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 0 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 10 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 29 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 78 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 166 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 158 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 30 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 12 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 12 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 119 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 2 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4792 0.19/0.48 0.19/0.48 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.012 s 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.001 s 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.013 s 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 2072 pages 0.19/0.48 0.19/0.48 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.014 s 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.003 s 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.018 s 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1824 pages 0.20/0.48 EOF